Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Microsoft weighs in: 'the future of the web is HTML5'

Where Steve Jobs leads, Microsoft follows -- how's that for shaking up the hornet's nest? It's said in jest, of course, but we've just come across a post from the General Manager for Internet Explorer, Dean Hachamovitch, and the perspective expressed by him on the subject of web content delivery broadly agrees with the essay penned by Jobs yesterday on the very same subject. Echoing the Apple CEO's words, Hachamovitch describes HTML5 as "the future of the web," praising it for allowing content to be played without the need for plug-ins and with native hardware acceleration (in both Windows 7 and Mac OS X). He goes on to identify H.264 as the best video codec for the job -- so much so that it'll be the only one supported in IE9's HTML5 implementation -- before turning to the dreaded subject of Flash.

This is where it gets good, because he literally repeats one of Jobs' six pillars of Flash hate: "reliability, security, and performance" are not as good as Microsoft would like them. Where Hachamovitch diverges from Apple's messiah, however, is in describing Flash as an important part of "a good consumer experience on today's web," primarily because it's difficult for the typical consumer to access Flash-free content. Still, it's got to be depressing for Adobe's crew when the best thing either of the two biggest players in tech has to say about your wares is that they're ubiquitous. Wonder how Shantanu Narayen is gonna try and spin this one.

The effect of the tsunami on Japan’s tech industry

Japan is still assessing the scale of Friday’s devastating tsunami, but in many parts of the country production has ground to a halt, and any long-term production issues could have a ripple effect on the technology industry.
Many computer and mobile device manufacturers, including Apple and Dell source digital imaging and storage parts manufacturing out to Japan which supplies about 40% of the world’s NAND memory – which is used in products such as Apple’s iPad. Japan is also responsible for a fifth of the world’s semiconductor supplies, and produced about 14 percent of the world’s computers, consumer electronics and communications gear last year.
With Japan being such a prolific NAND flash memory producer, the US based Micron Technology Inc’s shares jumped 3.2 percent with expectation that NAND memory prices would rise after news that Toshiba’s plant in Yokkaichi was affected by the earthquake. Toshiba, by itself, supplies more than a third of the world’s NAND memory chips.
20 of the world’s largest technology companies are Japanese and other large international technology companies such as AMD, Nokia,  Ericsson, IBM, EMC, Xerox, Kodak, Freescale – based in Tsunami stricken Sendai – and Nvidia have operations based in Japan.
Reports are still emerging, but here follows some information on what effect the devastation had on the top Japanese tech companies.
Hitachi
The Hitachi buildings and production facilities in Japan’s Ibaraki- and Fukushima prefectures suffered damage. Hitachi reports that the buildings were evacuated in time but it will probably take a few days before the firm can report the extent of the damage.
Sony
All its operations in Japan were halted and there were no immediate estimates as to when they would all be operational again. Sony has six factories, two in Fukushima and four in Miyagi, but all employees were safely evacuated.
Toshiba / SanDisk
Toshiba said yesterday it briefly shut a semiconductor plant in the northern prefecture of Iwate affected by power outage and all are being inspected for damage. According to reports, Toshiba, as a manufacturer of nuclear reactors, was asked by Prime Minister Naoto Kan to support efforts to stop radiation leaking from the Fukushima plant.
Panasonic
The company is said to have halted operations at several plants, including those manufacturing digital cameras, audio products and electronic components, in earthquake-struck northern Japan.
Panasonic’s head office said in a statement: ‘A few employees working at the Fukushima factory, the Sendai factory of AVC Networks Company and at the Koriyama factory of Panasonic Electronic Works received minor injury. As regards the impact on our business operations we are in the process of investigation.’
According to reports from Panasonic North America, three of Panasonic factories situated in Sendai, were still largely intact despite some structural damage.  No damage were reported to Panasonic’s Tokyo and Osaka offices.
Fujitsu
According to an official statement there were no reports of injuries sustained by Fujitsu’s employees from the earthquake. There have however, been reports of slight damages to buildings and power outages, but no reports of any severe damage. Fujitsu is investigating whether the disaster had affected their regular business operation at their Iwate plant.
Fujitsu also has manufacturing operations in Fukushima.
NEC
Japan’s biggest PC manufacturer, NEC, is still carrying out checks on all its manufacturing facilities to see whether they have been affected by Friday’s devastating earthquake.
Canon
The world’s biggest camera maker, didn’t suffer damage to plants that would halt output, said Hirotomo Fujimori, a spokesman in Tokyo, where the company is based.
Fujifilm
Fujifilm is still assessing the situation, but the company has a main manufacturing and assembly plant located in Sendai. Co-incidentally, Fujifilm announced 3 days prior to the disaster that there was a delay in shipping the X100 camera.
Sharp
Sharp’s new LED plant in Sakai also has been shut down, according to reports. Apparently smart systems at the Sakai plant automatically halted production as soon as the first tremors were felt.
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi Materials Corp, Japan’s third-largest copper refiner, stopped operations at its Onahama copper smelter in Fukushima prefecture, company spokesman Toshiaki Yamada said.
Sanyo
Sanyo also reportedly implemented shut downs, no specifics were given.
Nintendo
According to Nintendos’ official Twitter account, none of its employees were injured and none of its buildings suffered structural damage. Contrary to the Twitter hoax making rounds, Pokemon creator Satoshi Tajiri did not perish during the destruction.
Kyocera
Though Kyocera’s global headquarters and its wireless division in Yokohama and Daito were not affected, Kyocera stated that they are still assessing the situation.
Olympus
Olympus suffered no staff injuries or deaths, and reported only minimal structural damage, in some facilities located outside of Tokyo. Olympus does not expect manufacturing of its products to be impacted.
Seiko Epson
Seiko Epson suffered damages to its Sakata plant and also to group companies in the Tohoku areas. They did not report any casualties to staff.
Konica Minolta
Konica Minolta reported no major reports of injuries to employees and its Tokyo office and facilities suffered no major damage. There are also no reports of damage to any of its other production plants in Japan.
Nikon
Nikon hadn’t issued a statement, but one of its major plants might be affected. It has a camera factory in Sendai, 111 miles west from the epicenter.

Monday, March 14, 2011

Google vs Microsoft: A Guide to the Battle

Google Chrome OS, its new operating system for PCs and netbooks. And while we’re still debating whether it will take down Windows or flop like a fish on land, we tend to forget that this isn’t the first time Google’s challenged Microsoft. In fact, it’s become almost routine.

Whether its operating systems, documents, search, communication, or mobile, the two behemoths have been increasingly butting heads in a war for tech supremacy. Now with Google Chrome OS making headlines, we thought it would be appropriate to perform a straight-up comparison of where the competition between Google and Microsoft stands. So who’s winning the war? And how will Google Chrome OS affect this longstanding battle? Here’s an overview:


1. Search



Google: What is there to say, really? Search is to Google as Windows is to Microsoft. They dominate the search market by a wide margin, despite Microsoft’s best efforts (including the company’s failed attempt to buy Yahoo).
Microsoft: They had to do something drastic to compete in search, and they did with their recent launch of Bing. It’s received a lot of press, a lot of positive reviews, and has clearly caught Google’s attention. But does anyone seriously think it will overtake Google’s dominance in search anytime soon?
Advantage: Google. By light years.

2. Documents



Microsoft: Microsoft Office, with Word, Powerpoint, and Excel have been the leading way to create and edit documents for years, and for good reason – they’re widely used, widely known, and feature-rich. There’s also now Microsoft Office Live, which while not as collaborative as Google Docs, isn’t a bad solution and has the benefit of being connected to the desktop apps.
Google: Google Docs have been growing in features and users. They provide a level of collaboration that Microsoft documents simply don’t offer. But they don’t provide as many options as Microsoft Office and they just don’t have nearly as many users. This is one area where the majority of users still prefer the desktop to the web.
Advantage: Microsoft

3. Communication, Email, and IM


Microsoft: While Google’s probably more revered for Gmail and its communication suite, Hotmail is still bigger, and Live Messenger is heavily used. Microsoft also produces the popular Outlook software and has software in a variety of arenas, such as Windows Live Meeting, giving the company an edge in the enterprise.
Google: The search giant has a suite of very popular communication products – Gmail and Gtalk being the best known. The X factor in this debate though, is the upcoming Google Wave communication platform, which has impressed us so far. There’s also the intriguing Google Voice offering to consider.
Advantage: Push

4. Mobile



Google: Google’s has good traction with its Android mobile OS given it’s relatively new to the space. It runs on more than one million T Mobile phones and has a strong app platform. Many of Google’s apps also run well on mobile phones, especially Google Maps and YouTube.
Microsoft: Windows Mobile still shipped tens of millions of units last year, far outpacing Android. It also has apps to run Office, Outlook, and Windows Media Player. We think the long-term trend favors Google, but as of right now Microsoft is the leader.
Advantage: Microsoft, but perhaps not for long.

5. Operating System


Microsoft: This is Microsoft’s bread and butter. Windows is the reason Microsoft makes $60+ billion in revenue every year and has stayed on top for so long. Its stranglehold is legendary. Yet Windows Vista proved that it is not invincible.
Google: Let’s say this: we can’t wait to see what Google has in store for Google Chrome OS. We’re skeptical that it could ever kill Windows, but Google will be Microsoft’s most powerful challenger yet.
Conclusion: We look forward to the upcoming war.

Google vs. Microsoft

One of the most heated battles among technology companies was waged this year between Google Inc. and Microsoft Corp.
For those who think this corporate fight hit a crescendo in 2009, industry analysts say they better think again. It looks like this is just getting started.
The battle escalated this year as the two high-tech titans went after each other's market share and revenue stream in Internet search, operating systems,enterprise applications and browsers . With each company seeing the other as a major threat to its bread and butter products, 2009 may been just a warm-up for the battle that will ensue in the months to come.
"These two companies really squared off this year," said Jim McGregor, an analyst with In-Stat. "Both are looking for dominant positions in the Internet. For Google to increase its business, it needs to move into other territory. For Microsoft to have significant growth opportunities, it needs to become an Internet powerhouse, and they know it. This is not a war that is going to be won by one or two battles. This is going to be a prolonged activity."
He added that the battle isn't simply over which can be called top dog, because the fight is critical to both companies. "For Google, it's about expanding, and for Microsoft, it's about a life-or-death challenge," McGregor said.
The two companies basically grew into this face-off.
Google, one of the great Internet success stories, has grown into an online behemoth . With a name that has evolved into a verb meaning "to search," Google grown so much that it has become a threat to Microsoft, which has had a long and storied history of high-tech industry dominance. There was a time not so long ago when few believed that any company could rattle Microsoft, let alone a Web company like Google.
But those days are over. Google has rattled Microsoft's cage and, in turn, the software giant has set its sights on taking its new rival down a notch or two. Microsoft has spent millions of dollars and used countless manpower hours to grab a chunk of Google's search market share and topple the Web company from its new lofty perch above the high-tech industry - eliminating the threat to Microsoft's longheld industry dominance.
"The reason that Microsoft is so focused on Google is because Google is chipping away at Microsoft's crown jewels of Office and Windows with their online applications," said Dan Olds, an analyst with The Gabriel Consulting Group. "While Microsoft plays defense on the applications/operating system front, they're attacking Google on search and online services. Search is the key to Google's success since Web ads account for more than 90% of its revenue. If you can steal some eyes from Google's search engine, you cut into their ad revenue and, perhaps over time, cripple them."
This back and forth between the two companies intensified when Microsoft overhauled its far-from-beloved Microsoft Live Search and released the update, Bing search engine in June. But make no mistake about it - Google still owns the search market with a share of more than 64%. But Microsoft's Bing has failed to fail. The new search service has largely been gaining steam, albeit in small increments, but gaining nontheless.
Microsoft has more reason to hope that Bing will take a significant chunk out of Google search since the company announced plans over the summer to team with Yahoo Inc. , which holds the second-place spot in the search market - nestled snugly between Google and third-place Bing. The deal, which still has to be approved in the U.S. and in Europe, would have Yahoo give up its own search technology to use Microsoft's.
Pooling their resources and industry might, the two companies hope to do together what neither has been able to do alone - significantly make gains on Google's ubiquitous search.
The search battle heated up this fall when both companies announced they had struck individual deals to serve up real-time search results. Microsoft will be offering users real-time tweets from Twitter and posts from Facebook, while Google has already begun working with Twitter to offer up tweets in its search results.
But this fight extends beyond search.
Google pushed hard this past year to move its cloud-based office applications into the enterprise. Taking on Microsoft's ubiquitous Office applications was a bold move that could prove lucrative if it succeeds. Microsoft, however, isn't sitting back and watching Google move into that territory. The company announced this year that it plans to move its Office applications to the cloud and take on Google head-to-head.
The Google/Microsoft fight also extends into the browser arena with Google Chrome going up against Internet Explorer. Google also announced that it's working on the Linux-based Chrome OS operating system , which, if widely adopted, could help users see Google's Apps offering as a viable alternative to Microsoft's Office suite.
"This battle was always looking like a long-term conflict," Olds said. "It's the equivalent of high-tech trench warfare. In 2010, we can expect to see the bitter competition continue, with each company keeping up the heat with new features and innovations."
McGregor noted that the next 18 to 24 months are looking to be fun to watch with the two giants pulling out all the stops, and all their weaponry, to try to take down the other.
He added that the search market should expect to see a greater focus on real-time search and more advanced algorithms designed to help the search engines figure out what people are thinking and how to give them more information. For instance, instead of searching for pet stores and getting a list of stores in a certain area, users might be given a list of stores along with directions on how to get to each one from their current location.
Rob Enderle, an analyst with the Enderle Group, said we're likely to see more industry players, such as Apple Inc. , Mozilla Corp. and News Corp. aligning against Google.
"Both companies are largely betting their collective futures on this battle so the stakes are huge," Enderle said. "Microsoft is going to partner and try to starve Google out of content and partners. Google is going to work against Microsoft's pricing model and starve them out of money. Both are, for once, largely going after each other's relative weaknesses and leveraging their respective strengths, so this will likely be a battle for the history books."